West european geobotanists approaches to typology and mapping of vegetation territorial units

I. A. Lavrinenko

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31111/vegrus/2021.42.146


The relevance of this paper for Russian geobotanists is due to the fact that until recently the author had regularly come across the statement that the phytosociological approach cannot be used in vegetation mapping and in legends for the geobotanical maps. In my opinion, such attitude towards the potential of the generally accepted and most widespread phytosociological approach in world practice significantly impoverishes Russian geobotany. And more seriously, it significantly reduces the possibility of using modern technologies and international experience in the field of vegetation mapping.

In this regard, the purpose of the paper is to characterize the modern approaches of West European geobotanists to the typology of territorial units of vegetation based on phytosociological methods and their application to the plant cover mapping at different scales. Some of the most important stages in the development of this approach in West Europe are also reflected in the paper.

In 1928 J. Braun-Blanquet in his work Plant sociology proposed the main directions for studying the structure and composition of territorial units of vegetation. In the 1970s R. Tüxen laid the foundations of symphytosociology and proposed a method for transforming the system of syntaxa into sigma-syntaxa, and J.-M. Géhu and S. Rivas-Martínez, defined sigmetum as the basic unit of symphytosociology. The phytosociology of a plant landscape is based on the allocation of sigma-associations combinations of plant communities and their complexes within homogeneous landscape units, giving it physiognomic originality. In landscape phytosociology, two main directions are currently distinguished: symphytosociology, with sigmetum (series, sigma-association) as main typological unit and tesela as territorial one, and geosymphytosociology with geosigmetum (geoseries) and catena, respectively.

Thus, landscape phytosociology uses concepts that differ depending on the level of landscape organization: the level of series, or sigmetum (permaseries, curtaseries and, directly, series), and the level of geoseries, or geosigmetum geopermaseries, geocurtaseries and geoseries). Each series/geoseries in relation to the water supply regime belongs to one of four types: climatophilic, tempohygrophilic, edaphoxerophilic, and edaphohygrophilic.

Until the 1970s, only large-scale maps could be prepared on a phytosociological basis. They displayed homogeneous communities, predominantly of the association rank. Following the works of R. Tüxen, C. Beguin and O. Hegg, S. Rives-Martínez and J. M. Géhu, who substantiated the methodology of transforming the system of syntaxa into sigma-syntaxa based on phytosociological tables, sigmetum (series) and geosigmetum (geoseries) have become the main mapped units. It was during this period that a qualitative leap took place in geobotanical mapping, which made it possible to move from a large scale (1: 525 000), when communities of the association rank were highlighted on the map, to a smaller scale (1: 25500 000), with the combinations (sigmetum and geosigmetum) and preservation of most of the releve information.

France can be confidently attributed to the undisputed leader in the field of mapping (Géhu, 1979; Ozenda, 1985; Delbosc et al., 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018; Loidi, 2017; etc.), where the classification of territorial units of vegetation and geobotanical mapping as the basis of the nature protection system were raised to the state level as national programs. In addition to France, the intensive development of these approaches is currently taking place in Italy (Blasi et al., 2000, 2005, 2007, 2010, 2014, 2017; Biondi et al., 2004, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2014; Blasi, 2016; etc.), Spain (Rivas-Marténez, 1976, 2005; Rivas-Marténez et al., 2014, etc.) and Portugal (Pinto Gomes et al., 2003, 2007; Raposo et al., 2016). Also noteworthy are the works of scientists from Germany (Schwabe, 1989, 1991, 1997, 1999) and Switzerland (Beguin et al., 1979; Theurillat, 1991, 1992; Beguin, 1998, 2003, 2009), which made a significant contribution to landscape phytosociology.

Currently, we can say with confidence that in the countries of the European Union (EU) it is phytosociology that underlies the entire environmental system, including, first of all, the main legislative document of the EU on nature protection Council Directive 92/43 / EEC or Habitats Directive (Commission , 2003). The directive is largely based on the syntaxon set of plant communities, and the use of phytosociological terminology in the diagnosis and characteristic of habitats is often of key importance (Angelini et al., 2016). Since the approval of the Directive, phytosociology has actually been recognized as a basic science for the biodiversity management, which is reflected in the existence of a number of pan-European and national projects Natura 2000, CORINE, EUNIS, CarHAB, etc., which are carried out and funded at the national and EU levels.

On the basis of the principles and methods of landscape phytosociology in West Europe, approaches to geobotanical mapping are intensively developing, in which not only individual scientists and scientific schools, but also educational and government institutions (ministries, committees, departments, etc.) participate. National programs for classification and mapping of vegetation are formed and actually work. Based on this approach, over the past 23 decades, hundreds of vegetation maps of various scales have been prepared, covering both individual regions and provinces, and the territories of entire states. Fundamentally, this approach provides an excellent opportunity to combine the fundamental research results based on the latest achievements of phytosociology with their direct application in practice in the field plant cover monitoring, environmental protection and land use.

Key words: territorial units of vegetation, classification, sigmetum, geosigmetum, symphytosociology, geosymphytosociology, geobotanical mapping.

Section: Scientific reviews

How to cite

Lavrinenko I. A. 2021. West european geobotanists approaches to typology and mapping of vegetation territorial units // Rastitelnost Rossii. 42: 146164. https://doi.org/10.31111/vegrus/2021.42.146

Received October 10 2020. Signed for printing December 30 2021


Angelini P., Casella L., Grignetti A., Genovesi P. 2016. Manuali per il monitoraggio di specie e habitat di interesse comunitario (Direttiva 92/43/CEE) in Italia: habitat. ISPRA. Serie Manuali e Linee Guida. 142. 280 p.

Azuelos L., Renault O., Vergno M., Ferreira L., Lafon P., Filoche S., Hendoux F., Fernez T., Bressaud H., Rambaud M., Mobaied S. 2013. Les milieux naturels et les continuités écologiques de Seine-et-Marne. Conservatoire botanique national du Bassin parisien Muséum National dHistoire Naturelle, Conseil Général de Seine-et-Marne. 375 p.

Bardat J., Bioret F., Botineau M., Boullet V., Delpech R., Gehu J.-M., Haury J., Lacoste A., Rameau J.-C., Royer J.-M., Roux G., Touffet J. 2004. Prodrome des végétations de France. Coll. Patrimoines naturels. Muséum national dHistoire naturelle. 61: 1171. Paris.

Béguin C. 1998. De lutilisation des cartes phytosociologiques pour létablissement des concepts de paysages végétaux (phytogéocoenoses). Saussurea. 29: 149165.

Béguin C. 2003. De lusage des cartes phytosociologique et géomorphologique pour la conceptualisation des unités de paysage végétal (Sigmeta), exemple dans la région de Lona (Valais Suisse). Documents phytosociologiques. N. S. 20: 155166.

Béguin C. 2009. Carte des paysages végétaux de la region Lona-Sasseneire (Valais). Bulletin de la Murithienne. 126: 5362.

Béguin C., Hegg O. 1975. Quelques associations dassociations (sigmassociations) sur les anticlinaux jurassiens recouverts dune végétation naturelle potentielle (essai danalyse scientifique du paysage). Documents phytosociologiques N. S. 9 : 918.

Béguin C., Géhu J.-M., Hegg O. 1979. La symphytosociologie: une approche nouvelle des paysages végétaux. Documents phytosociologiques. N. S. 4: 4968.

Biondi E., Calandra R., Gigante D., Pignatelli S., Rampiconi E., Venanzoni R. 2002. Ilpaesaggio vegetale della provincia di Terni. Provincia di Terni - Università di Perugia Terni. 104 p.

Biondi E., Feoli E., Zuccarello V. 2004. Modelling Environmental Responses of Plant Associations: A Review of Some Critical Concepts in Vegetation Study. Critical Reviews inPlant Sciences. 23(2): 149156. http://doi.org/10.1080/07352680490433277.

Biondi E., Allegrezza M., Baldoni M., Casavecchia S., Pinzi M., Taffetani F. 2010. Le serie di vegetazione della regione marche. La vegetazione dItalia. Carta delle serie di vegetazione scala 1 : 500 000. P. 230252.

Biondi E., Casavecchia S., Pesaresi S. 2011. Phytosociological synrelevés and plant landscape mapping: from theory to practice. Plant Biosystems. 145(2): 261273. http://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2011.572569.

Biondi E., Allegrezza M., Mentoni M. 2012. Geosynphytosociological analysis of the plant landscape of an area with high geomorphology variability on the central Italian Adriatic coast. Acta Botanica Gallica. 159(2): 187200. https://doi.org/10.1080/12538078.2012.696983.

Biondi E., Blasi C., Allegrezza M., Anzellotti I., Azzella M. M., Carli E., Casavecchia S., Copiz R., Del Vico E., Facioni L., Galdenzi D., Gasparri R., Lasen C., Pesaresi S., Poldini L., Sburlino G., Taffetani F., Vagge I., Zitti S., Zivkovic L. 2014. Plant communities of Italy: The Vegetation Prodrome. Plant Biosystems. 148(4): 728814. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2014.948527.

Bioret F., Capelo J., Pedrotti F. 2017. À propos de la cartographie des habitats dintérêt communautaire de la Directive européenne 92/43/CE. Documents phytosociologiques. 6: 446451.

Blasi C. 2016. The Vegetation Series of Italy and Applications in Biodiversity Conservation. Vegetation Structure and Function at Multiple Spatial, Temporal and Conceptual Scales. Cham, Switzerland. P. 241256. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21452-8_9.

Blasi C., Carranza M-L., Frondoni R., Rosati L. 2000. Ecosystem classification and mapping: a proposal for Italian landscapes. Applied Vegetation Science. 3: 233242. https://doi.org/10.2307/1479002.

Blasi C., Capotorti G., Frondoni R. 2005. Defining and mapping typological models at the landscape scale. Plant Biosystems. 139(2): 155163. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263500500163629.

Blasi C., Filibeck G., Burrascano S., Copiz R., Di Pietro R., Ercole S., Lattanzi E., Rosati L., Tilia A. 2007. Primi risultati per una nuova regionalizzazione fitogeografica del territorio italiano. Biogeographia. 28: 923. https://doi.org/10.21426/B6110070.

Blasi C. (ed.), Allegrezza M., Andreis C., Angiolini C., Assini S., Bacchetta G., Baldoni M., Bagella S., Bazan G., Beccarisi L., Bernardo L., Blasi C., Biondi E., Bouvet D., Brullo S., Buffa G., Casavecchia S., Ciaschetti G., Cremonese E., Cutini M., De Domimcis V., Di Marzio P., Di Pietro R., Ercole S., Farris E., Fascetti S., Filesi L., Filibeck G., Filigheddu R., Fortini P., Frattaroli A. R., Gabellini A., Gamper U., Ghirelli L, Gigante D., Lasen C., Marchiori S., Mariotti M. G., Medagli P., Mion D., Morra di Cella U., Mossa L., Passalacqua N.G., Paura ., Pedrotti F., Pignattelli S., Pinzi M., Pirone G., Presti G., Poldini L., Puppi G., Raimondo F. M., Rampiconi E., Rosati L., Sburlino G., Schicchi R., Siniscalco C., Spampinato G., Speranza M., Stanisci A., Strumia S., Taftetani F., Ubaldi D., Vagge I., Venanzoni R., Verde S., Vidali M., Zanotti A. L., Zuccarello V. 2010. La Vegetazione dItalia con Carta delle Serie di Vegetazione in scala 1: 500 000. Rome, Italy. 24 p.

Blasi C., Capotorti G., Copiz R., Guida D., Mollo B., Smiraglia D., Zavattero L. 2014. Classification and mapping of the ecoregions of Italy. Plant Biosystems. 148(6): 12551345. http://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2014.985756.

Blasi C., Capotorti G., Alós Ortía M.-M.-A., Anzellottia I., Attorrea F., Azzellaa M.-M., Carli E., Copiza R., Garfìb V., Manesa F., Marandoa F., Marchettib M., Molloa B., Zavatteroa L. 2017. Ecosystem mapping for the implementation of the European Biodiversity Strategy at the national level: The case of Italy. Environmental Science & Policy. 78: 173184. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.09.002.

Braun-Blanquet J. 1932. Plant sociology: the study of plant communities. New York. 439 p.

Braun-Blanquet J., Pavillard J. 1928. Vocabulaire de sociologie végétale. Montpellier. 23 p.

Bruno F., Petriccione B., Attorre F. 2003. La cartografia della vegetazione in Italia. Braun-Blanquetia. 26: 127.

Capelo J., Mesquita S., Carlos costa J.-C., Ribeiro S., Arsénio P., Neto C., Monteiro-Henriquleis T., Aguiar C., Honrado J., Espírito-Santo D., Lousã M. 2007. A methodological approach to potential vegetation modeling using GIS techniques and phytosociological expert-knowledge: application to mainland Portugal. Phytocoenologia. 37(34): 399415. https://doi.org/10.1127/0340-269X/2007/0037-0399.

Chalumeau A., Bioret F. 2013. Méthodologie de cartographie phytosociologique en Europe: approches symphytosociologique et géosymphytosociologique. Synthèse bibliographique. Rapport Institut de Géoarchitecture Université de Bretagne occidentale, Ministère de lÉcologie, du Développement durable et de lÉnergie. Brest, France. 124 p.

Cianfaglione K., Pedrotti F. 2019. The Red Beech at the Montagna di Torricchio, Marche Region, Central Italy. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca. 47: 860866. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha47311583.

Commission of the European Communities. 2003. Council directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora. As amended by the Accession Act of Austria, Finland and Sweden (1995) and the Accession Act of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic (2003). Official Journal of the European Union L 236 33 23.9.2003. Brussels. European Commission 1992/95/2003. 52 p.

Delbosc P., Bacchetta G., Gonçalves J.-C., Bioret F., Panaïotis Ch., Lalanne A., Pedrotti F., Boullet V., Sawtschuk J. 2015. Phytosociologie dynamico-catenale des vegetations de la Corse: methodologies typologique et cartographique. Geographie. Brest. 748 p.

Delbosc P., Bioret F., Panaïotis Ch. 2016. Subhalophilous and halophilous geopermaseries and minoriseries of sandy and sandy gravel systems of Corsica: typology, bionomy and sequential analysis vegetation. International Journal of Geobotanical Research. 6: 926.

Delbosc P., Bioret F., Panaïotis Ch. 2017. Dynamic-catenal phytosociological mapping of Corsica: inductive methodological approach. Contribuţii Botanice. 52: 2954. https://doi.org/10.24193/Contrib.Bot.52.3.

Delbosc P., Tanne M., Bioret F., Panaïotis Ch., Sawtschuk J. 2018. Analyse spatio-temporelle du paysage vegetal du massif du Haut-Vénacais (Corse). Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography. 846: 116. https://doi.org/10.4000/cybergeo.28937.

Diaz Gonzales T. E. 2014. Mapas de vegetation de las series geoseries y geopermaseries de Espana. 1.250.000: Asturias [Maps of vegetation series, geoseries and geopermaseries from Spain: Asturias. 1.250.000]. Global Geobotany. 3: 134.

Doucet G., Filoche S., Hendoux F. 2013. Atlas des habitats naturels et semi-naturels de la Seine-Saint-Denis. Conservatoire botanique national du Bassin parisien  Muséum national dHistoire naturelle. Observatoire Départemental de la Biodiversité Urbaine en Seine-Saint-Denis, Département de Seine-Saint-Denis. 158 p.

Fernez T., Causse G. 2015. Synopsis phytosociologique des groupements végétaux dÎle-de-France. Conservatoire botanique national du Bassin parisien. Direction régionale et interdépartementale de lenvironnement et de lénergie dÎle-de-France. Paris. 89 p.

Fernez T., Lafon P., Hendoux F. 2015. Guide des végétations remarquables de la région Île-de-France. Conservatoire botanique national du Bassin parisien. Direction régionale et interdépartementale de lenvironnement et de lénergie dÎle-de-France. Paris. 2 Volumes: Méthodologie. 67 p., Manuel pratique de determination. 224 p.

Géhu J.-M. 1976. Sur les paysages végétaux, ou sigmassociations des prairies salées du Nord-Ouest de la France. Documents phytosociologiques. 15(18): 5762.

Géhu J.-M. 1977. Le concept de sigmassociation et son application à ľétudé du paysage végétal des falaises atlantiques francaises. Vegetatio. 34(2). P. 117125. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00054479.

Géhu J.-M. 1979. Pour une approche nouvelle des paysages végétaux: la symphytosociologie. Bulletin de la Société Botanique de France. Lettres Botaniques. 126(2): 213223. https://doi.org/10.1080/01811797.1979.10824391.

Géhu J.-M., Rivas-Martínez S. 1981. Notions fondamentales de Phytosociologie. Syntaxonomie. Berichte der lnternationalen Symposien der lnternationalen Vereinigung fur Vegetationskunde. Rinteln. 1980. Vaduz. P. 533

Ichter J., Savio L., Poncet L. 2012. Synthèse des expériences européennes de cartographie de la végétation (Programme CarHAB). Paris. 126 .

Knapp R. 1975. Vegetation Ecology (Sociological Geobotany). Progress in Botany. Berlin; Heidelberg. P. 350363. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-66259-1_23.

Loidi J. 2017. Dynamism in Vegetation. Vegetation Changes on a Short Time Scale. The Vegetation of the Iberian Peninsula. Plant and Vegetation. 12: 8199. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54784-8_3.

Ozenda P. 1985. La végétation de la chaine alpine dans lespace montagnard Européen. Masson; Paris; New York etc. 344 p.

Pedrotti F. 2013. Plant and vegetation mapping. Heidelberg; New York; Dordrecht; London. 204 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30235-0.

Pedrotti F. 2015. Chorology and Phytosociology of Sessile Oak [Quercus petraea (Mattuschka) Liebl.] in Trentino-Alto Adige (East-Central Alps) of Northern Italy. Warm-Temperate Deciduous Forests around the Northern Hemisphere. Heidelberg; New York; Dordrecht; London. P. 175180. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01261-2_10.

Pedrotti F. 2018. Vegetation Series Along Climatic Gradients in the Central Southern Alps (Trentino-Alto Adige Region). Climate Gradients and Biodiversity in Mountains of Italy. Cham, Switzerland. P. 5181. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67967-9.

Pinto-Gomes C., Rosendo J., Paiva-Ferreira R., Sariva R., Martins E. 2003. O Papel da Cartografia da Vegetação no Ordenamento Florestal: O Caso do Sudoeste Alentejano e Barlavento Algarvio, Departamento de Ecologia, Universidade de Évora, Rua Romão Ramalho, Vol. 59. Évora. 10 p. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237696399_O_Papel_da_Cartografia_da_Vegetacao_no_Ordenamento_Florestal_O_Caso_do_Sudoeste_Alentejano_e_Barlavento_Algarvio?enrichIdrgreq-2f688652ed8c25a0f935d133fb4d8b5a-XXX&enrichSourceY292ZXJQYWdlOzIzNzY5NjM5OTtBUzozMjc4NzM4MTE1MDEwNThAMTQ1NTE4MjYxNjkxMQ%3D%3D&el1_x_2&_escpublicationCoverPdf.

Pinto Gomes C. J., Paiva-Ferreira R., Meireles C. 2007. New Proposals on Portuguese Vegetation. Lazaroa. 28: 6777. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_LAZA.2010.v31.3.

Raposo M., Mendes P., Cano-Ortiz A., Pinto Gomes C. 2016. Series de vegetacao para a conservacao no centro e sul de Portugal continental. Botanique. 1: 113148.

Rivas-Martínez S. 1976. Sinfitosociologia, una nueva metodologia para el studio del paisaje vegetal. Anales Instituto Botánico A.J. Cavanilles. 33: 179188.

Rivas-Martínez S. 1981. Les étages bioclimatiques, secteurs chorologiques et series de végétation de lEspagne mediterranéenne. Journal of Mediterranean Ecology. 8(12): 275288.

Rivas-Martínez S. 1987. Nociones sobre Fitosociología, Biogeografía y Bioclimatología. La vegetación de España. Cham, Switzerland. P. 1945.

Rivas-Martínez S. 1996. Origen y desarrollo de la Fitosociología en España. Braun-Blanquetia. 18: 1518.

Rivas-Martínez S. 2005. Notions on dynamic-catenal phytosociology as a basis of landscape science. Plant Biosystems. 139(2): 135144. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263500500193790.

Rivas-Martínez S., Fernandez-Gonzalez F., Loidi J., Lousa M., Penas A. 2001. Syntaxonomical checklist of vascular plant communities of Spain and Portugal to association level. Itinera Geobotanica. 14 : 5341.

Rivas-Martínez S., Asensi A., Díez-Garretas B., Molero J., Valle F., Cano E., Costa M., López M. L., Díaz T. E., Prieto J. A. F., Llorens L., del Arco M., Fernández F., Sánchez-Mata D., Penas Á., Masalles R., Ladero M., Amor Á., Izco J., Amigo J., Loidi J., Molina J. A., Navarro C., Cantó P., Alcaraz F., Báscones J. C., Soriano  P. 2007. Mapa de series, geoseries y geopermaseries de vegetación de España [Memoria del mapa de vegetación potencial de España] Parte I. Itinera Geobotanica. 17: 5436.

Rivas-Martínez S., Asensi A., Díez-Garretas B., Molero J., Valle F., Cano E., Costa M., Villar L., Díaz T. E., Antonio J. F. P., Llorens L., del Arco M., Fernández F., Sánchez-Mata D., Penas Á., Herrero L., del Río S., Masalles R., Ladero M., Amor Á., Izco J., Amigo J., Loidi J., Navarro G., Cantó P., Alcaraz F., Báscones J. C., Pilar Soriano P. 2011. Mapa de series, geoseries y geopermaseries de vegetación de España [Memoria del mapa de vegetación potencial de España] Parte II. Itinera Geobotanica. 18(1): 5424.

Rivas-Martínez S., Izco J., Díaz-González T. E., Penas A., Costa J. C., Amigo J., Herrero L., Giménez de Azcárate J., Del Río S. 2014. The Galician-Portuguese biogeographic sector. An inicial advance. International Journal of Geobotanical Research. 4: 6581.

Roux C., Thébaud G., Bouzillé J.-B., Bonis A., Hennekens S. 2019. Descrierea vegetației la nivel de peisaj: paysage, o bază de date destinată seriilor și geoseriilor. Contribuţii Botanice. 54: 1324. https://doi.org/10.24193/Contrib.Bot.54.1.

Schwabe A. 1989. Vegetation complexes of flowing-water habitats and their importance for the differentiation of landscape units. Landscape Ecology. 4: 237253. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00125094.

Schwabe A. 1991. A method for the analysis of temporal changes in vegetation pattern at the landscape level. Vegetatio. 95: l19. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00124950.

Schwabe A. 1997. Sigmachorology as a subject of phytosociological research: A review. Phytocoenologia. 27(4): 463507. https://doi.org/10.1127/phyto/27/1997/463.

Schwabe A. 1999. Spatial Arrangements of Habitats and Biodiversity: An Approach to a Sigmasociological View. Biodiversity in ecosystems: principles and case studies of different complexity (Tasks for Vegetation Science). 34: 75106. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4677-7_5.

Sochava V. B. 1968. Rastitelnye soobshchestva i dinamika prirodnykh sistem [Plant communities and the dynamics of natural systems]. Doklady Instituta geografii Sibiri i Dalnego Vostoka. Vyp. 20 [Reports of the Institute of Geography of Siberia and the Far East. Iss. 20]. P. 1222. (In Russian).

Suck R., Bushart M. 2010. Karte der potentiellen natürlichen Vegetation Deutschlands 1:500.000. Legende und 5 Karten (unterschiedliche Bearbeiter). Bonn Bad Godesberg, Bundesamt für Naturschutz. 24 p.

Theurillat J.‐P., Willner W., Fernández‐González F., Bültmann H., Čarni A., Gigante D., Mucina L., Weber H. 2021. International code of phytosociological nomenclature. 4th edit. Applied Vegetation Science. 3(e12491): 162. https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12491.

Tüxen R. 1973. Vorschlag zur Aufnahme von Gesellschaftskomplexen in potentiell naturlichen Vegetationsgebieten. Acta Botanica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae. 19 (14): 379384.

Tüxen R. 1977. Zur homogenitat von sigmassoziationen, ihner syntaxonomischen ordnung und ihrer verwendung in der vegetationskartierung. Documents phytosociologiques N. S. 1 : 321327.

Tüxen R. 1978. Bemerkungen zu historischen, begrifflichen und methodischen Grundlagen der Synsoziologie. Assoziationskomplexe (Sigmeten). Vaduz. P. 312.

Veronico G., Sciandrello S., Matera R., Tomaseli V. 2017. Vegetation map of zone umide Della Capitanata (SCI IT9110005). Thalassia Salentina. 39: 2533. https://doi.org/10.1285/i15910725v39p25.

Wojterska M., Balcerkiewicz S., Brzeg A. 2018. The map of vegetation complexes of the Seili island and its surroundings (SW Finland). Biodiversity Research and Conservation. 52(1): 3541. https://doi.org/10.2478/biorc-2018-0016.